THE WEEKLY LETTER
Dominating Dividends
Wednesday, August 26, 2026
EDITOR'S NOTE
A dividend cut is in the numbers before it is in the press release
By the time the announcement lands, the warning has been visible for a year.
A dividend cut arrives as news. A release goes out before the market opens, the stock drops, and the income an owner was counting on gets smaller that afternoon.
The decision behind it is old by then. Boards do not cut a dividend the week the idea comes up. They cut it after quarters of arguing about how much longer the cash can stretch.
That argument leaves marks. Earnings stop covering the payout, then cash flow stops covering it, and the difference gets filled with borrowing or with something sold.
All of it sits in public filings the whole time. It is quieter than a yield, so fewer people look.
 
THE CASE
Three annual reports, then the cut
The dividend held at two dollars the whole way down.
Picture a payer with a two dollar annual dividend and a share price of forty dollars. The yield is 5 percent, and the dividend has not moved in years.
In year one the company earns $3.20 a share. The two dollar dividend takes about 63 percent of that. Free cash flow, the cash left after the business pays for its own upkeep, is $3.00 a share, so the payout is funded with a dollar to spare.
In year two earnings fall to $2.40 a share. The same two dollar dividend now takes 83 percent of earnings, and free cash flow of $2.10 covers it by a dime.
In year three earnings fall to $1.60 a share. The dividend is now 125 percent of earnings, free cash flow is $1.50, and the company is fifty cents a share short. That gap gets closed with borrowing, with a sale, or out of the cash pile.
Nothing was announced in any of those three years. The dividend was paid on schedule every quarter. Across those same three years the yield climbed from 5 percent to 10 percent, because the price fell from forty dollars to twenty while the payout held.
The risk worth naming in plain language: a dividend the business is not earning has to be funded by something else, and every one of those sources runs out. The board watches that source shrink for three years before anyone writes a press release.
Illustrative example with round numbers and assumed figures, not a forecast. General education, not advice.
 
THE PRINCIPLE
We wait for an announcement to make a fact feel true.
A dividend cut arrives as an event. There is a date, a headline, a price move. Events register, so the mind files the cut as something that happened that morning.
The decline that produced it had no date. It showed up across three annual reports, each one slightly worse than the last, and none of them newsworthy on its own.
That is where owners get caught. The timing of their attention gets handed to the company's communications calendar, and a company has no reason to hurry bad news.
The filings are slow, public, and open to anyone willing to read them a year early.
 
THE CLOSE
That is the issue. Short, on purpose. This week's move takes two minutes: pick the highest yielding position you own and work out its payout ratio.
Divide the annual dividend per share by earnings per share over the last twelve months. Below about 60 percent leaves an ordinary business room to absorb a bad year. Above 100 percent means the company paid out more than it earned, and the difference came from somewhere else.
Utilities and real estate trusts run higher by design, so the honest comparison is against a company's own history and its own industry.
Hit reply and tell us what number you got. We read every response, and it shapes what we write.
Keep learning at Dominating Dividends
New issues arrive Wednesday mornings.
 
Disclosures. Dominating Dividends is a financial publisher, not an investment adviser. We are not registered as an investment adviser, broker-dealer, or investment company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, FINRA, or any state securities regulator, and we do not hold ourselves out as such. We publish general, impersonal educational commentary under the publisher's exclusion from the definition of investment adviser in Section 202(a)(11)(D) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as recognized in Lowe v. SEC, 472 U.S. 181 (1985). Nothing in this email is investment, financial, tax, or legal advice, a recommendation, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. Our content is general in nature and is not tailored to your objectives, financial situation, risk tolerance, or needs, and we have no fiduciary duty or relationship to you. Consult a qualified financial professional before acting on anything you read here. Figures shown are illustrative or historical; any performance shown is backtested unless expressly stated otherwise and has inherent limitations. Past performance and long dividend records do not guarantee future results. All investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The publisher and its writers may hold positions in securities mentioned. See our full Disclosures and Terms of Use.
 

Reply

Avatar

or to participate